Manuscripts

1. Home
2. Manuscripts
3. Search (BETA)

Search suggestions

Suggestions

AAberdeenAberystwythAberystwyth, National Library of Wales, PeniarthAdmontAngersArmaghArrasAuxerreAvignonAvranchesÁBBambergBerlinBernBookBrusselsCCambraiCambridgeCambridge, HarvardCardiffCashelCastlereaChartresChatsworthCínCodexColmarCopenhagenCorkCracowCwrt MawrDDouaiDresdenDublin, King's InnsDublin, National Library of IrelandDublin, Royal Irish AcademyDublin, Trinity CollegeDublin, University CollegeEEdinburghEngelbergExeterÉFFermoyFlorenceFuldaGGlasgowGroningenHHeidelbergHeiligenkreuzIÍJKKarlsruheKillineyKlosterneuburgLLaonLe MansLe*b*rLeidenLichfieldLilienfeldLiverpoolLlyfrLodgeLondonLondon, British Library, MS AdditionalLuxembourgLyonMMadisonManchesterMarburgMaynoothMelbourneMelkMetzMilanMontpellierMount MellerayMullingarMunichNNaplesNew YorkNivellesOOrléansOxfordÓPPaduaParisPennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPlas BodorganPoitiersPontignyPrincetonPsalterQRReimsRennesRomeRouenSSalisburySchaffhausenSt OmerSt. GallenSt. Paul im LavanttalStockholmStonyhurstStuttgartTThe HagueTroyesTurinUUppsalaÚVValenciennesVatican CityVeniceVeronaViennaWWolfenbüttelWürzburgXYZZwettl

Manuscript:

Leiden, University Library, MS Bur. Q. 3

No catalogue entry available

• Texts (0)
• References (1)

Petruccione, John F., “The glosses of Prudentius’s Peristephanon in Leiden, Universiteitsbibliotheek, Burmann Quarto 3 (Bur. Q. 3) and their relationship to a lost commentary”, The Journal of Medieval Latin 23 (2013): 295–333.  

abstract:

Burmann Quarto 3, a ninth-century manuscript of the works of Prudentius, is well known to philologists and art historians, to the former (under the siglum E) as a major source for the text of the poems, to the latter for its illustrations of the Psychomachia. This article focuses on the glosses to Peristephanon. First, I describe the hands of the seven main glossators and attempt to identify those who, in addition to glossing, corrected and/or punctuated the poetic text. I then provide the editio princeps of the glosses, in which I arrange the glosses by hand. A comparison of these glosses with those in Paris, B.N. lat. 8086 (P) suggests that the first two glossators of E and the first glossator of P drew on a common source; indeed, the two manuscripts show so many similarities that it looks quite possible that they were written in the same scriptorium. From a comparison of the E and P glosses on Pe. to those found in other manuscripts of approximately the same period, I infer that E and P preserve material from a lost commentary on Pe. composed by Johannes Scotus Eriugena, which, a generation later, became the basis for the extant commentary by Remigius of Auxerre. I find support for this theory in the fact that, in their wording and content, the glosses of E and P on Contra Symmachum sometimes agree with those of John against the corresponding glosses of Remigius.

Results for Le*b*r (50)

• Leabhar Bercháin na Clúana Sosta (lost)

Not yet published.

An Irish manuscript, now lost, known from a note in the Leabhar Breac which states that the copy of Scéla Alaxandair was taken from this manuscript: Agaid Belltaine indiú, hi Cluain Sostai Berchain dam ann oc scribend derid na staire (.i. Alexander) for tus a Liubar Berchain na Clúana. It may also be the Saint beraghans boke listed in a catalogue of the library of the Earls of Kildare.

• before s. xvⁱⁿ

• Leabhar Bhriain mheic Dhomhnaill (lost)

• Leabhar buidhe Moling

Not yet published.

A manuscript now lost but cited by name in Keating’s Foras feasa Érinn (iii 32) and Dubhaltach Mac Fhir Bhisigh’s Leabhar mór na ngenealach.

• Leabhar Chlúana hEidnech

Not yet published.

An Irish manuscript now lost but mentioned by Geoffrey Keating in his Foras feasa ar Éirinn. In his prologue he lists the Leabhar Chluana h-Eidhneach Fionntain i Laoighis (‘The book of Clonenagh of Fintan in Laoighis’) among the books of learning (senchas) that were still in existence in his time, whether in original or copied form. A number of further references and citations by Keating suggest that it contained a set of annals, which as Joan Radner has argued, may be related to the now Fragmentary annals of Ireland.

• 1152 x 1634?

• Leabhar Chon Chonnacht Uí Dhálaigh

Irish manuscript now lost but cited by Mícheál Ó Cléirigh as a source for his transcription of the text Cogad Gáedel re Gallaib, of which he made a secondary copy in Brussels MS 2569-72 (dated March 1628 from Multyfarnham, Co. Westmeath). The title suggests an association with the bardic poet Cú Chonnacht Ó Dálaigh (d. 1139).

• Leabhar do sgriobh Sioghraidh úa Maolconaire do Roisi ingin Aoda Duibh

• Leabhar Dubh Molaga

• Leabhar Dúin Dá Leathglas

Not yet published.

A manuscript now lost but cited as a source in Irish genealogical material.

• Leabhar Gearr Uí Cheallaig

Manuscript used as an exemplar for texts in the Dublin, Royal Irish Academy, MS 23 P 12.

• Leabhar gerr Í Buadhacháin

Not yet published.

• date unknown

Return to search results